![usps firstclass vs first class epacket usps firstclass vs first class epacket](https://11tcma2eyqgmz6zyt1x6na8n-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-9.45.59-AM.png)
This revolving door to an industry job "retirement" at triple your Have worked almost long enough in government positions to pass through Weaken, rather than strengthen, the postal system. The revolving door protects policies that At lower levels of governance, a revolving door injects corporate executives into the USPS, and rotates USPS executive out toĬommercial competitors.
USPS FIRSTCLASS VS FIRST CLASS EPACKET PROFESSIONAL
Policy written by lobbyists rather than professional staff, through powerĭerived from the influence of money to drive political appointments and policy, from not telling anyone what you are doing until it is done. Itself), power flows in ways familiar to us from Congress: through Mailers Technical Advisory Committee, the USPS Board of Governors People, for whom the postal system was mandated by the Constitution andįor whom it was created by our country's foundingĪt high levels of governance (the Postal Regulatory Commission, the Postal System have a large say in running it, and we don't - we, the Corporations which compete with the United States Governance of our postal system, like our Congress itself, isĭysfunctional. Look you in the eye, but their hands are busy elsewhere. Has treated me to a slow-motion murder movie.
![usps firstclass vs first class epacket usps firstclass vs first class epacket](https://tipsncare.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/usps-first-class-vs-priority.jpg)
![usps firstclass vs first class epacket usps firstclass vs first class epacket](http://1ivu6q1gqh2kndjc23ryof11v5.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/priority-mail-2016-vs-2017.png)
Package traffic is growing, make sure the UPS can't benefit from it.The Drive for Privatization, The Worship of Profitability.Introduction - Slow motion murder of the postal system.forces Americans to subsidize eBay's profits with below-cost deliveries from China.Īmericans subsidize China's postal service with an inadequately compensated ride on our infrastructure.ĮBay collects revenue, we don't collect postage. leaves the USPS open to domestic political pressure to privatize (abolish) itĦc. leaves the USPS itself open to domestic political attack for being "unprofitable"Ħb. has accepted below-cost payment from ChinaPost for these services, which, in turn,Ħa. has spent money enhancing First Class logistics and tracking services given to China while depriving Americans of online accessĦ. Give China access to the country's First Class Small Parcel delivery system and not pay for it ĥ. has been betrayed in near-secret trilateral negotiations initiated and led by eBay corporation to, to has been blocked from Internet-driven revenue growth in on-line package mailing, leaving e-commerce growth for competitors Ĥ. has been burdened with complexity and rate instability ģ. That there will soon be another round of closures to "save the system"Ģ.
![usps firstclass vs first class epacket usps firstclass vs first class epacket](https://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/5420720/il_570xN.201319107.jpg)
Profits shrink, by closing down and selling assets (e.g., distribution centers) to insure Institution) by curtailing profitable services, and then, when has been forced away from service (of us) and survival (as an We see today a United States Postal Service (USPS) that:ġ. Money, so break it up and give my corporation the pieces!" Justify the Privatize Now! argument that says, "They'll never make Of many burdens on the back of the USPS and its letter carriers which The US Postal System (USPS) currently subsidizes ChinaPost to pleaseĮBay: eBay collects fees, but we don't collect the postage.